
2nd September 2005, 00:10
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Schöneck, Germany (for now)
Posts: 18
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Why does ISPConfig use the old apache?
Hi,
I setup my box according to the perfect suse 93, there's apache2 on it but when ISPConfig gets configured it uses apache1. Is there a reason for this or a work around so that apache2 gets used?
__________________
 Mod what U can, when U can, Where U can
|

2nd September 2005, 03:01
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 48
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
My understanding is...
1.3 is used for the ispconfig interface. Your 2.0 is used to actually host pages.
|

2nd September 2005, 08:32
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lüneburg, Germany
Posts: 31,911
Thanks: 693
Thanked 4,198 Times in 3,213 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by linutzy
1.3 is used for the ispconfig interface. Your 2.0 is used to actually host pages.
|
Yes, thats right. I dont see any reason actually why we should change to apache 2 as long as apache 1 .3 is supported with bugfixes and we dont miss a function in apache 1.3 for the controlpanel.
|

2nd September 2005, 20:25
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lüneburg, Germany
Posts: 41,665
Thanks: 1,896
Thanked 2,595 Times in 2,446 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by linutzy
1.3 is used for the ispconfig interface. Your 2.0 is used to actually host pages.
|
Yes, that's right. To make it perfectly clear: Apache 1.3.33 is used for the ISPConfig web interface on port 81, and it's totally independent from your normal Apache 2.0 which hosts your normal web pages using ports 80 and 443. ISPConfig uses its own Apache to be independent from the main Apache configuration and restarts and failures of the main Apache.
|

3rd September 2005, 13:24
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 364
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Tank for the info guys. I was wondering if you can provide a list of things we should't do so that ISPC doesn't break. I know apache is independent from your actual hosting. What about the firewall updates, spamassassin updates, ect.?
|

4th September 2005, 07:48
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Schöneck, Germany (for now)
Posts: 18
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Thanx for answering my question. Ididn't think of it this way.
__________________
 Mod what U can, when U can, Where U can
|

6th September 2005, 20:15
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lüneburg, Germany
Posts: 41,665
Thanks: 1,896
Thanked 2,595 Times in 2,446 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by domino
Tank for the info guys. I was wondering if you can provide a list of things we should't do so that ISPC doesn't break. I know apache is independent from your actual hosting. What about the firewall updates, spamassassin updates, ect.?
|
As long as the firewall update is about the firewall software (iptables) and not the firewall rules, there's no problem here.
The SpamAssassin that comes with ISPConfig is compiled with special options and has nothing to do with the Spamassassin package of your distribution so you can update that too, but it will have no effect on the ISPConfig Spamassassin.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:54.
|
|
Recent comments
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 10 hours ago
1 day 15 hours ago
1 day 16 hours ago
2 days 7 hours ago
2 days 7 hours ago
2 days 12 hours ago
2 days 18 hours ago
2 days 19 hours ago
2 days 20 hours ago