#1  
Old 4th April 2006, 04:18
sbovisjb1 sbovisjb1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Gentoo vs Debian

I was reading on the internet, when a article popped up saying that gentoo is what debian was 3 versions ago... is this true.
http://singe.rucus.net/blog/archives...vs-Debian.html
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 4th April 2006, 18:18
falko falko is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lüneburg, Germany
Posts: 41,701
Thanks: 1,900
Thanked 2,741 Times in 2,575 Posts
Default

I've never used Gentoo. I always use Debian on my servers because it's stable and mature, and I love apt!
__________________
Falko
--
Download the ISPConfig 3 Manual! | Check out the ISPConfig 3 Billing Module!

FB: http://www.facebook.com/howtoforge

nginx-Webhosting: Timme Hosting | Follow me on:
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th April 2006, 22:09
danf.1979 danf.1979 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chile
Posts: 247
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via MSN to danf.1979
Default

I used gentoo not long ago. APT is far more mature, fast and confortable than porthole system (emerge). Last time I checked, if you had installed package X that depended on Y and Z, and some day you decide to uninstall Z or Y, you don't get any warning about package X. This will eventuallu get fixed ofcourse. Anyway, emerge is slooooooow, but there are some faster alternatives.
Compiling everything is just not practical. Is like saying "Oh my god! I need openoffice to do some work for tomorrow!" and you're just compiling X (heh).
And regarding speed, there is not really a noticeable difference.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 4th April 2006, 22:58
sbovisjb1 sbovisjb1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Thats why the guy was so ****** off, because gentoo (ive seen this) has sometimes taken 48hrs to compile!! (This was on a slow system)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th April 2006, 03:32
JohnS JohnS is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sbovisjb1
I was reading on the internet, when a article popped up saying that gentoo is what debian was 3 versions ago... is this true.
http://singe.rucus.net/blog/archives...vs-Debian.html
Not true if you mean the age of the software. Debian software is ancient compared to Gentoos. Also:

The following two HOWTOs provide a binary installation of Gentoo:

GENTOO 2006.0 Gnome, KDE and Xfce in less than 3 hours.

http://linux.coconia.net/gentoo/2006.htm

GENTOO 2005.1 Installation Script/Walk-Through.

http://linux.coconia.net/gentoo/2005.htm

You can have GENTOO 2006.0 Gnome running in 15 minutes.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 6th April 2006, 05:28
sbovisjb1 sbovisjb1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I see, but what me and my friend were getting at is that emerge is impractical, we have installed gentoo before in the past... but the funny thing is that he finds flavors that other people take and modify so that it is better/easier to use... well they are fun to use. He got a Gentoo flavour off a forum that doesnt exist anymore in 2004 and only 74 people had downloaded! Also another extremely good Gentoo Version is the hackthissite live cd... i found it to be quite powerfull and stable and it help me and my friend to analize quite a few security vulnerabilities and on top of that it comes with 100+ hacking/security related tutorials... its great i learned so much about firewalls from it. Anyways... who could tell me how to install the Gentoo Hackthissite live cd... just what would have been done for a gentoo live cd. Thanks!!

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24th April 2006, 17:45
22hosting 22hosting is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I have to say that Gentoo's compiling from scratch is a GOOD thing. If you compile everything the way you want it it's going to be far more streamlined than just sticking binaries straight on there...
________
Bernadette

Last edited by 22hosting; 22nd August 2011 at 13:12.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30th April 2006, 02:01
sbovisjb1 sbovisjb1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Yes but most people dont have the patience or time to do that. The only reason that a linux system administrator would do that, is if his WHOLE system is identical and therefore he could get away with porting his configurations to the other systems... then he would have a fanatastic network.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15th May 2006, 23:56
22hosting 22hosting is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

If you're putting in the infrastructure of a new network, chances are that most of the pc units will be the same to begin with. All you need to do is create one from scratch and ghost it to the whole lot.
Although granted, not everybody can be bothered, but if you're a tedious sysadmin (as most arent) then you will have the right thing in mind for security by compiling from scratch and removing unwanted components. Plus with the speed of most modern processors compiling gentoo from scratch really doesn't take that long. Hell, winblows takes about 40 mins to 1 hour on a P4...
________
BONGS

Last edited by 22hosting; 22nd August 2011 at 13:12.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 24th May 2006, 14:47
nkassi nkassi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
 
Default

I've seen a really nice thin client (diskless) of about 50+ computers running gentoo and FreeBSD. They are used at McGill University for there Computer Science labs. The nice thing is that distcc allows them to build pretty fast.

I'm a Debian person now but for a long time (since gentoo 1.0) I've been a gentoo fan. Although in recent times syncing portage is terribly slow compared to what it was couple years ago. Seriously they really have to fix that because Apt takes 1 min to update it's tree compared to 15min for emerge.

Nic
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Perfect Setup - Debian Woody (3.0)... sending mail from my XP box? ExCIA HOWTO-Related Questions 17 27th June 2007 18:31
Bind-Chroot-Howto (Debian) spaz HOWTO-Related Questions 5 9th March 2006 14:50
Difference between Debian Sarge kernel update -> 64 bit & Debian Unofficial AMD64 ver Hans Installation/Configuration 2 2nd March 2006 23:41
e-mail problem!!! Debian 3.1 maroonworks Installation/Configuration 18 6th December 2005 14:42
Debian Sarge RAID5 killfrog Installation/Configuration 2 23rd October 2005 21:43


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.