
20th July 2007, 17:10
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Which window manager?
I will be installing FreeBSD an old pc for my wife to use solely for word processing and possibly web surfing. It will be connected to my lan for printer sharing. It is 350Mh with 320Mb ram, and I'm looking for a small, fast window manager. The WM's only function will be to start and manage AbiWord and Firefox. Icons and eye candy aren't at all important.
I'm thinking of Ratpoison, IceWM, BlackBox, or FluxBox. Any suggestions are appreciated.
|

21st July 2007, 19:31
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lüneburg, Germany
Posts: 31,853
Thanks: 781
Thanked 1,558 Times in 1,477 Posts
|
|
I think XFCE is quite nice.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to falko For This Useful Post:
|
Toad (22nd July 2007)
|

22nd July 2007, 23:01
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by falko
I think XFCE is quite nice.
|
Good idea. I've played with xfce4 a little bit. I'll just install it and won't have to spend time fooling with the others. Thanks.
|

24th July 2007, 20:45
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
I agree with Falko, I use KDE here on my 3.2Ghz multi-tasking desktop. For an older machine with limited task usage (Abiword, Firefox), XFCE is a good choice.
|

27th July 2007, 18:21
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: in my shell.
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
XFCE is pretty sweet but you might want to think about lwm.
Stands for lightweight window manager.
http://www.jfc.org.uk/software/lwm.html
|

11th October 2007, 17:14
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
If you need something light i would suggest : FluxBox
http://www.fluxbox.org
|

11th October 2007, 18:23
|
|
Pseudo Lawyer
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 857
Thanks: 3
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts
|
|
Fluxbox would be quite small and fast....
XFCE would be a lot more confortable but slower...
The call is yours
|

13th October 2007, 09:52
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
yup, xfce is very light
|

7th February 2008, 01:31
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I love XFCE and Fluxbox, they are both really quick I would recommend trying them both out because they are both worthy.
Good luck!
__________________
Ubuntu 7.10 + Fluxbox, Dell Latitude CPi, Pentium 2, 192MB, 266Mhz
|

7th February 2008, 07:00
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I seem to fluctuate between KDE and xfce.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:07.
|
Recent comments
1 hour 30 min ago
7 hours 18 min ago
9 hours 9 min ago
10 hours 54 min ago
14 hours 45 min ago
20 hours 29 min ago
20 hours 41 min ago
1 day 59 min ago
1 day 6 hours ago
1 day 11 hours ago