
16th February 2007, 17:11
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lüneburg, Germany
Posts: 31,872
Thanks: 689
Thanked 4,182 Times in 3,201 Posts
|
|
ISPConfig 2.2.10 Beta available
I've finished the beta for ISPConfig 2.2.10. This release is for testing purposes, if you run a production server, please wait for the final relaese of ISPConfig 2.2.10
The installer file can be downloaded here:
http://www.ispconfig.org/downloads/I...0-beta1.tar.gz
I've not finished the changelog yet, but you may see the changes in the SVN log of the stable branch svn://ensignweb4.de/ispconfig/branches/ISPConfig-2.2.stable/
Please test it and report any errors. If no errors where found, I will release it as 2.2.10 final next week.
|

18th February 2007, 21:38
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montfoort, The Netherlands
Posts: 2,252
Thanks: 208
Thanked 642 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Nice,
I will give it a try and will inform you about my experience with the new upcoming version!
__________________
Hans
BB-Hosting | Quality Web Hosting since 2005
|

18th February 2007, 22:22
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,010
Thanks: 254
Thanked 134 Times in 120 Posts
|
|
No test server to test it on, so I'll pass for now
|

19th February 2007, 14:09
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montfoort, The Netherlands
Posts: 2,252
Thanks: 208
Thanked 642 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
ISPConfig 2.2.10 beta 1 up and running!
I just installed ISPConfig 2.2.10 beta 1 on my Debian Sarge test-server and everything works fine! Well done!
__________________
Hans
BB-Hosting | Quality Web Hosting since 2005
|

19th February 2007, 17:23
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bremen, D
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I tried the upgrade on a 1 week old ISPConfig 2.2.9 on a test server (Debian Etch). Only one Domain w/ some custom DNS; a quick test with www, pop3, smtp and dns shows that these services are running fine.
A small warning came up throughout spamassasin / clamav installation:
Code:
cp -f clamassassin /home/admispconfig/ispconfig/tools/clamav/bin
chmod 555 /home/admispconfig/ispconfig/tools/clamav/bin/clamassassin
Argument "6.30_01" isn't numeric in subroutine entry at Makefile.PL line 8.
Argument "6.30_01" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at Makefile.PL line 136.
What email address or URL should be used in the suspected-spam report
text for users who want more information on your filter installation?
Do the site certificates need to be recreated, or could a reuse of the already created certificates be implemented? Then we didn't need to re-enter all the information, and certificates that are already installed in our browsers could be used.
Regards,
JCD
|

19th February 2007, 17:28
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lüneburg, Germany
Posts: 31,872
Thanks: 689
Thanked 4,182 Times in 3,201 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Do the site certificates need to be recreated, or could a reuse of the already created certificates be implemented? Then we didn't need to re-enter all the information, and certificates that are already installed in our browsers could be used.
|
I have entered this as feature request in our tracking system, but it will not make it in the 2.2.10 release anymore.
The clamassassin version is the same then in 2.2.9, so I guess it should work even with this error. Did you notice any problems with clamassassin after the installation?
|

19th February 2007, 17:38
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bremen, D
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
clamassassin?  Edit: Ok, I've googled it. Didn't know that.
Both the Eicar test file and the GTube test string were caught by the mail system. Oh, and service monitoring also works.
Edit: And thanks for the feature request!
Last edited by jcdirks; 19th February 2007 at 17:48.
|

20th February 2007, 21:40
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bremen, D
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Having said that the monitoring service works, there might be one issue. After the update, I was getting notification that a sercive was down. That was correct, I had tested TCP on port 90 the other day, and there surely is no service there.
However, I was not getting any notifications before the update, I asume I had turned the monitoring off. Maybe the update had turned monitoring on again?
|

20th February 2007, 21:53
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lüneburg, Germany
Posts: 31,872
Thanks: 689
Thanked 4,182 Times in 3,201 Posts
|
|
Yes, it might be that the update overwrites this setting but it can be disabled again.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:46.
|
Recent comments
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 8 hours ago
1 day 9 hours ago
1 day 11 hours ago
1 day 12 hours ago
1 day 14 hours ago
1 day 15 hours ago
2 days 7 hours ago
2 days 8 hours ago
2 days 11 hours ago