View Single Post
Old 23rd May 2007, 14:58
till till is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lüneburg, Germany
Posts: 37,015
Thanks: 840
Thanked 5,652 Times in 4,461 Posts

Isn't it a good idea to use clamdscan in ISPConfig instead of clamscan? As you mentioned, it is much faster indeed. And nobody would have the quota problem anymore.
Yes, thats my idea too. The main problem is to find a way to not break any old installations and every linux distribution has its spamd in another location so we will have to deliver and run a own spamd as we currently deliver the clamscan binary.

The behaviour that clamscan unpacks the files in temp instead of using a central database must have been introduced with version 0.90 as we never had these problems with the 0.88 versions.
Till Brehm
Get ISPConfig support and the ISPConfig 3 manual from
Reply With Quote