View Single Post
  #4  
Old 2nd February 2011, 20:59
MrCompTech MrCompTech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 92
Thanks: 1
Thanked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Is there a way to roll back dovecot to the earlier version without losing my email domains and mailboxes?

Or have they already been deleted by the dovecot upgrade.

Where does ISPConfig store the email information, domains, aliases, forwards, mailboxes, etc.?

... checked on some things

I see in the database table dbispconfig that the mail domains, forwarders and mail users are still there.
I do see a pass word column as well.

... tried using yum to downgrade dovecot but received an error

Code:
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Downgrade Process
updates/metalink                                         |  10 kB     00:00
updates                                                  | 4.7 kB     00:00
updates/primary_db                                       | 4.1 MB     03:21
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package dovecot.x86_64 1:2.0.1-1.fc14 set to be downgraded
---> Package dovecot.x86_64 1:2.0.8-2.fc14 set to be erased
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: 1:dovecot-mysql-2.0.8-2.fc14.x86_64 (@updates)
           Requires: dovecot = 1:2.0.8-2.fc14
           Removing: 1:dovecot-2.0.8-2.fc14.x86_64 (@updates)
               dovecot = 1:2.0.8-2.fc14
           Downgraded By: 1:dovecot-2.0.1-1.fc14.x86_64 (fedora)
               dovecot = 1:2.0.1-1.fc14
           Available: 1:dovecot-2.0.9-1.fc14.i686 (updates)
               dovecot = 1:2.0.9-1.fc14
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
Next option is to uninstall dovecto and see if I can install the previous one.

...

Uninstall went OK, but when I used 'yum list obsoletes dovecot' the previous version was not listed. I am guessing the the upgrade to FC14 changed the repositories and I need to find the repo that has the previous version of dovecto.

Last edited by MrCompTech; 2nd February 2011 at 21:47.
Reply With Quote