I gave it another shot so here it is everything you asked for
/etc/fstab
Code:
/dev/md2 / ext3 defaults 1 1
/dev/md0 /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
/dev/md1 swap swap defaults 0 0
/boot/grub/menu.lst
Code:
default=0
fallback=1
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title CentOS (2.6.18-164.el5)
root (hd1,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-164.el5 ro root=/dev/md2
initrd /initrd-2.6.18-164.el5.img
title CentOS (2.6.18-164.el5)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-164.el5 ro root=LABEL=/
initrd /initrd-2.6.18-164.el5.img
It's not LVM
so here it is the problem...
Code:
[root@centoso ~]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/hda: 8589 MB, 8589934592 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1044 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/hda2 14 144 1052257+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/hda3 145 1044 7229250 83 Linux
Disk /dev/hdd: 8696 MB, 8696889344 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 16851 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdd1 * 1 208 104391 fd Linux raid autodetect
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/hdd2 208 2295 1052257+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/hdd3 2296 16639 7229250 fd Linux raid autodetect
Disk /dev/md2: 7402 MB, 7402684416 bytes
2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 1807296 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes
Disk /dev/md2 doesn't contain a valid partition table
Disk /dev/md1: 1077 MB, 1077411840 bytes
2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 263040 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes
Disk /dev/md1 doesn't contain a valid partition table
Disk /dev/md0: 106 MB, 106823680 bytes
2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 26080 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes
Disk /dev/md0 doesn't contain a valid partition table
I'm using VirtualBox for this. I googled the fact that partition 1 does not end on a cylinder boundary but apparently it isn't that big of a deal. Well it seems I didn't google enough.
I hadn't noticed that the raid arrays don't have a valid table though. Any suggestions at this point?