thesquib
10th May 2006, 21:49
I've been investigating setting several new servers for a few months in my spare time at work, and things are coming to a crunch. I have had a test box running for a while on ISPConfig, with Debian Sarge. For the most part this has been great - aside from a weird issue where it won't reboot (i haven't been able to identify what this is yet because theres no video signal.. haven't found any logs).
Anyway - I was wondering what experiences people have had with setting up mail / web / database services. Currently we have a system with no fallback, limited syncing/backup. Mail server is run on some old version of Windows. There is one BSD box which has a mysql/apache/bind.
So obviously this is crap :)
The load on these servers needs to easily handle 150 websites, and a 1000 email users. An obviously not all at once. The mail here is more important than anything else.
We want to split this up, we want to have a webserver (with a fallback), a load balanced database server (if one of these servers goes down ideally it would fallback on the other). A mail server, with a backup which would in the case of failure i nthe primary server, would catch emails and deliver them when the server is back online.
Is it a good idea to do split this up? In terms of easy configuration etc... We also want to be able to have some form of web based configuration, and we all agree ispconfig is good. But it won't work over multiple servers..?
Is it better to setup a couple of boxes configured with sql/apache/dns/mail and load balance, sync - and have a third to backup...
I guess i'm trying to figure out a good way to get started. There are good tutorials here, which I have been using for starting points for my test setup. But now i'd like to get to the real thing.
Any thoughts and questions welcomed...
Anyway - I was wondering what experiences people have had with setting up mail / web / database services. Currently we have a system with no fallback, limited syncing/backup. Mail server is run on some old version of Windows. There is one BSD box which has a mysql/apache/bind.
So obviously this is crap :)
The load on these servers needs to easily handle 150 websites, and a 1000 email users. An obviously not all at once. The mail here is more important than anything else.
We want to split this up, we want to have a webserver (with a fallback), a load balanced database server (if one of these servers goes down ideally it would fallback on the other). A mail server, with a backup which would in the case of failure i nthe primary server, would catch emails and deliver them when the server is back online.
Is it a good idea to do split this up? In terms of easy configuration etc... We also want to be able to have some form of web based configuration, and we all agree ispconfig is good. But it won't work over multiple servers..?
Is it better to setup a couple of boxes configured with sql/apache/dns/mail and load balance, sync - and have a third to backup...
I guess i'm trying to figure out a good way to get started. There are good tutorials here, which I have been using for starting points for my test setup. But now i'd like to get to the real thing.
Any thoughts and questions welcomed...