jmroth
30th January 2008, 20:18
I just read
http://www.heise.de/ix/foren/S-Blacklist-Eintraege-durch-Bounces-vermeiden/forum-48292/msg-14324386/read/
The following diff will help ISPConfig not autoresponding to potential spam (if SA is enabled) and ending oneself up in some blacklist, as mentioned in the artice.
--- autoresponder.rc.master.orig 2008-01-30 19:14:42.000000000 +0100
+++ autoresponder.rc.master 2008-01-30 19:09:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
| formail -rD 8192 {PFAD}/.vacation.cache
:0 ehc # if the name was not in the cache
+ * ! ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
+ # don't autoreply to potential spam
| (formail -rI"From: {EMAIL_ADDRESS}" -I"Precedence: junk" \
-A"X-Loop: ${EMAIL}" ; \
cat {PFAD}/.vacation.msg \
http://www.heise.de/ix/foren/S-Blacklist-Eintraege-durch-Bounces-vermeiden/forum-48292/msg-14324386/read/
The following diff will help ISPConfig not autoresponding to potential spam (if SA is enabled) and ending oneself up in some blacklist, as mentioned in the artice.
--- autoresponder.rc.master.orig 2008-01-30 19:14:42.000000000 +0100
+++ autoresponder.rc.master 2008-01-30 19:09:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
| formail -rD 8192 {PFAD}/.vacation.cache
:0 ehc # if the name was not in the cache
+ * ! ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
+ # don't autoreply to potential spam
| (formail -rI"From: {EMAIL_ADDRESS}" -I"Precedence: junk" \
-A"X-Loop: ${EMAIL}" ; \
cat {PFAD}/.vacation.msg \