clamav

[netserpent]

Hello. My request is about clamav. How about change from clamscan to clamdscan in clamassassin, becouse clamscan take all CPU power then load virus DB each time then the check email message.

[Herbert]

My request to!
Please use clamd in the next version.
I have also problems with clamscan, clamd is fine and ok

[falko]

Take a look here for now: http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13385&highlight=clamd+ispconfig
http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12864&highlight=clamd+ispconfig

[Herbert]

Falko i'am already using clamdscan
-
Clamscan use for every user a single process
One process used 6% of CPU (Celeron 2800Mhz)
I have more dan 300 Email accounts on my server, if example 15 users received a email then clamav startup 15 process * 6% CPU = 95% total CPU
I'am not the only one, so my opinion is use clamd in the next update.

[falko]

But the threads are about using clamd... Here's another one: http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12860

[sonoracomm]

Hi Folks,

First, many thanks to the developers of ISPConfig...a really great package.

I too would like to see clamd and clamdscan supported by ISPConfig and I think it is important. I would also like to see the SaneSecurity stuff supported as well.

Yes, I already have clamd/clamdscan and SaneSecurity signatures implemented. They seem to work great and I've not had any obvious problems. I use a Centos 5 base OS and I have notes that I will post to my web site one of these days or will make available upon request.

However, the installation/configuration seems to break with an ISPConfig update which makes it all of dubious value to me. Could we, at a minimum, support it/them enough to survive the next update of ISPConfig?

Thanks for listening,

G